Astro Weather

Seven days of forecast at a glance, made for one question: is the night worth it? Clouds at three heights, estimated seeing and transparency, wind, temperature and dew point – plus sun and moon altitude with the moon phase. In Europe the weather data come from the ICON model of Germany’s national weather service, the DWD, elsewhere from the US models GFS and HRRR; a second cloud row shows the ECMWF model for comparison.

🔒 The forecast is only loaded when you click Load forecast. Your browser then requests the data from Open-Meteo, a service based in Switzerland, and transmits your IP address in doing so. More in the privacy policy.

No data loaded yet.

🔭 Planets, the moon and the best objects of the night for this location: Observing Planner.

Weather map by meteoblue

meteoblue

How to read the chart

Every hour gets an overall rating from 0 to 100 %: how well it suits observing and imaging. From 85 % it is Excellent, from 65 % Good, from 45 % Average, from 25 % Poor, below that Very poor. Clouds make up most of it – a sky only half covered already caps an hour at 25 %.

The seven-day chart, from top to bottom

The table

One row per night, noon to noon: when it is astronomically dark, which part of that is dark with the moon down – the moon is below the horizon then, the best time for galaxies and nebulae –, the overall rating of those dark hours, how much of the moon is lit and when it rises (↑) and sets (↓). Where the forecast covers a night only in part, a note below the rating says for how many of the dark hours there are data. Clicking a night opens it in detail. On narrow screens every night appears as a card of its own.

Night in detail

Moving the mouse over a chart or tapping it shows every value for that hour; a tap beside it closes the box again. On a phone both charts can be swiped sideways while the labels on the left stay in place. After loading, the seven-day chart starts at Now and the night detail at sunset.

Terms in brief

Where the values come from – and where they are estimates

Clouds, wind, temperature, humidity and the weather symbols come straight from a weather model, up to seven days ahead. Which one depends on the location.

In Europe – more precisely, between 29.5 and 70.5° N and between 23.5° W and 62.5° E – the page uses the DWD’s ICON model. In Central Europe the first two days or so come from ICON-D2 at 2.2 km grid spacing, after that from ICON-EU at 7 km, and the last two days or so from ICON global at about 11 km, which provides no visibility. The night detail states which model a night comes from.

Outside Europe the data come from the US weather agency NOAA: in the USA, southern Canada and northern Mexico the first two days or so from HRRR at 3 km grid spacing, after that and in the rest of the world from GFS at about 13 km. The deciding factor was a check for Starfront: over 30 nights, GFS/HRRR and ECMWF came much closer to the hourly cloud reports of the surrounding airports than ICON, which above all forecast clear hours as cloudy too often.

The ECMWF row is a second opinion: total cloud cover from the IFS model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts at 9 km grid spacing, anywhere in the world. It does not feed into the overall rating.

Night in detail uses the same requests and states above the chart which model the night comes from. The interfaces also offer 15-minute values, but for clouds, wind and temperature they are merely interpolated between the hourly values – so the chart shows hourly values.

Seeing is not provided by any weather model. The chart estimates it from the wind profile: the jet stream at about 10 km altitude, the wind shear between roughly 1.5 and 10 km – how strongly direction and speed change with height – and the wind at the ground. All three make the air turbulent. Where a site is so high that 1.5 km lies inside the terrain, the chart starts from the next pressure level above. The weighting is my own; it gets the trend right, but it is no substitute for a real seeing forecast.

Transparency is estimated from the aerosol optical depth (AOD) of the Copernicus CAMS forecast. It is damped a little at very high humidity near the ground and by a lot of water vapour in the air column, taken from the ECMWF model – only gently, as water vapour absorbs little visible light. Dust is already part of the AOD; the tooltip and the night detail still show it separately, because it explains why a sky looks milky. The CAMS data only reach about four to five days ahead; after that the row stays dark grey.

Overall is a weighting of my own: clouds decide almost everything, seeing and transparency only nudge a clear hour up or down.

Sun and moon are calculated by your browser; nothing is requested for them. Planets and the best objects of a night are shown by the Observing Planner.

The weather map is an embedded meteoblue service and not part of this page’s calculations: it shows meteoblue’s own satellite and forecast data for the chosen location.

Weather data by Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Models: DWD ICON (Europe), NOAA GFS and HRRR (outside Europe), ECMWF IFS (comparison row, water vapour) · Aerosol: Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) · Weather map: meteoblue. Seeing, transparency and the overall rating are derived from these data.